Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2022 77 • VG SZ II 2022 77 Generato dall'IA

Equalization Fund Reimbursement Denial Upheld for Lack of Evidentiary Proof of Loss

Numero d'incarto II 2022 77
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company sought reimbursement under the COVID-19 loss of earnings compensation scheme, but the responsible equalization fund denied the claim because the company had not submitted the required documentation demonstrating the pandemic-related loss of income. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the right to compensation is conditional upon the claimant providing the necessary evidentiary proof of the specific loss incurred due to the pandemic measures, which the company failed to furnish.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Equalization Fund Reimbursement Denial Upheld for Lack of Evidentiary Proof of Loss: The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the right to compensation is conditional upon the claimant providing the necessary evidentiary proof of the specific loss incurred due to the pandemic measures, which the company failed to furnish.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
indennità per perdita guadagno regresso dell'assicuratore conguaglio revisione della cassa cassa malati non riconosciuta prova della solvibilità Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19 Erwerbsersatz) | Erwerbsersatzordnung
Generato dall'IA
II 2022 64
Employer Reimbursement Denial for Lost Earnings Due to COVID-19 Measures Causation Dispute
II 2022 41
Claimant v. Compensation Fund: Denial of COVID-19 Earnings Replacement Benefits
II 2022 76
Cultural Corporation Appeal of Denied COVID-19 Loss Compensation
II 2020 59
Claimant v. Administrative Body (COVID-19 Loss of Earnings Appeal)
II 2021 109
Company Reimbursement Claim for COVID-19 Short-Time Work Allowance Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 77 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Januar 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ GmbH, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19 Erwerbsersatz) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: