Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2022 59 • VG SZ II 2022 59 Generato dall'IA

Pension Scheme Disability Rating Dispute

Numero d'incarto II 2022 59
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision regarding the calculation of their disability pension under a mandatory occupational pension scheme, specifically challenging the degree of disability (IV-Grad) used for the calculation. The court reasoned that the relevant disability degree must be determined based on the functional limitations affecting the claimant's capacity to perform the occupation covered by the insurance at the time the insured event occurred, adhering strictly to the assessment criteria defined in the relevant pension regulations and not solely relying on the general disability assessment from the social insurance authority.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Pension Scheme Disability Rating Dispute: The court reasoned that the relevant disability degree must be determined based on the functional limitations affecting the claimant's capacity to perform the occupation covered by the insurance at the time the insured event occurred, adhering strictly to the assessment criteria defined in the relevant pension regulations and not solely relying on the general disability assessment from the social insurance authority.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
fissazione della rendita d'invalidità regime pensionistico vertenza di assicurazione sociale criteri di valutazione previdenza obbligatoria assicurazione per invalidità
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 59 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 14. Dezember 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Klägerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Beklagte, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Berufliche Vorsorge (Invalidenrente: Berechnung IV-Grad) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: