Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2022 56 • VG SZ II 2022 56 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Denial

Numero d'incarto II 2022 56
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against the decision of a compensation fund regarding supplementary benefits. The appellant was denied supplementary benefits based on an objection decision dated June 3, 2022. The court, in its decision of October 19, 2022, reached its verdict after reviewing the facts presented in the case concerning the supplementary benefits claim.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Denial: The appellant was denied supplementary benefits based on an objection decision dated June 3, 2022. The court, in its decision of October 19, 2022, reached its verdict after reviewing the facts presented in the case concerning the supplementary benefits claim.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni complementari fondo di compensazione rinascita del diritto alla prestazione d'assicurazione procedura di assicurazioni sociali condizione del diritto alla prestazione assicurativa revisione delle prestazioni d'invalidità

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
This article governed the imposition of court costs on the losing party.
Generato dall'IA
II 2021 9
Appeal Against Denial of Free Legal Aid for Supplementary Benefits Proceedings
II 2020 69
Supplementary Benefit Asset Valuation Appeal
II 2018 85
Appeal of Denial of Supplementary Benefits Based on Imputed Hypothetical Income
II 2018 43
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2023 94
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefit Calculation and Rent Allowance

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

This article governed the imposition of court costs on the losing party.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 56 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. Oktober 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Oxana Straub, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Einspracheentscheid vom 3. Juni 2022) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: