Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2022 48 • VG SZ II 2022 48 Generato dall'IA

Maintenance Arrears Offset Against Supplementary Benefits

Numero d'incarto II 2022 48
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant, a recipient of supplementary benefits, challenged the decision of the cantonal compensation fund to offset assumed family law maintenance payments against her benefits, as the payments were deemed to be in arrears and not actually received or used for the intended purpose of supporting the recipient. The court reasoned that for such payments to be considered as actual income and thus reduce supplementary benefits, the claimant must have a genuine, enforceable right to receive the maintenance payments, and these payments must be effectively made or available to the claimant to cover their needs, which was not sufficiently established in this case regarding the alleged arrears.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 65 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Maintenance Arrears Offset Against Supplementary Benefits: The court reasoned that for such payments to be considered as actual income and thus reduce supplementary benefits, the claimant must have a genuine, enforceable right to receive the maintenance payments, and these payments must be effectively made or available to the claimant to cover their needs, which was not sufficiently established in this case regarding the alleged arrears.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
arretrati alimentari pagamento delle prestazioni prestazione familiare fondo di compensazione indennità per inconvenienze controversia di sicurezza sociale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 2 BGG
The appeal is rejected on the grounds set out in Art. 65 para. 2 BGG regarding the merits of the case.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The Appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
II 2024 104
Supplementary Benefits Calculation: Family Law Maintenance Imputation
II 2022 74
Appeal on Supplementary Benefits Calculation: Maintenance Deduction and Imputed Rental Income
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets
II 2021 115
Supplementary Benefit Repayment Based on Subsequent Income
II 2022 83
Supplementary Benefits Denial Upheld Despite Recalculated Usufruct Value

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 2 BGG

The appeal is rejected on the grounds set out in Art. 65 para. 2 BGG regarding the merits of the case.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The Appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 48 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. August 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch ihre Mutter B.________, ebenda, \n diese vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Anrechnung familienrechtlicher Unterhaltsbeiträge) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: