Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2022 22 • VG SZ II 2022 22 Generato dall'IA

COVID-19 Earned Income Replacement Compensation for Business Closure

Numero d'incarto II 2022 22
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A complainant sought entitlement to compensation payments under the COVID-19 Earned Income Replacement Ordinance due to business closure, arguing that the resulting loss of income qualified them for benefits despite having other income sources. The court reasoned that the ordinance's purpose was to compensate for losses directly attributable to mandated business closure related to the pandemic, and since the complainant's specific business activity was halted by official decree, the loss of income stemming from that closure, irrespective of other existing income streams, justified the compensation entitlement under the relevant statutory provisions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV; COVID-19 Earned Income Replacement Compensation for Business Closure: The court reasoned that the ordinance's purpose was to compensate for losses directly attributable to mandated business closure related to the pandemic, and since the complainant's specific business activity was halted by official decree, the loss of income stemming from that closure, irrespective of other existing income streams, justified the compensation entitlement under the relevant statutory provisions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
reddito sostitutivo chiusura dell'azienda diritto all'indennizzo vita aziendale prestazione statutaria cessazione dell'attività lucrativa Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19; Erwerbsersatz) | Erwerbsersatzordnung

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV

The appeal was dismissed, and thus the appellant must bear the court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 22 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Mai 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Milena Pesic, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19; Erwerbsersatz) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: