Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2022 18 • VG SZ II 2022 18 Generato dall'IA

Foundation v. LLC: Contractual Penalty for Pension Information Failure

Numero d'incarto II 2022 18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A foundation providing flexible early retirement benefits in the main construction industry sued a limited liability company for a contractual penalty related to occupational pension obligations. The court was asked to decide on the enforceability of this penalty. The court reasoned that the contractual penalty clause stipulated for non-compliance with the obligation to provide information was legally valid, as the foundation had demonstrably suffered damage due to the delayed and incomplete submission of the required employment data by the company, thus upholding the imposition of the penalty.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Foundation v. LLC: Contractual Penalty for Pension Information Failure: The court was asked to decide on the enforceability of this penalty. The court reasoned that the contractual penalty clause stipulated for non-compliance with the obligation to provide information was legally valid, as the foundation had demonstrably suffered damage due to the delayed and incomplete submission of the required employment data by the company, thus upholding the imposition of the penalty.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
pena convenzionale fondazione di previdenza società a responsabilità limitata pensionamento anticipato fondazione imprese di costruzione Berufliche Vorsorge (Konventionalstrafe) | Berufliche Vorsorge (ohne med. SV)
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 18 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Mai 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n Stiftung für den flexiblen Altersrücktritt im Bauhauptgewerbe (FAR), Obstgartenstrasse 19, 8006 Zürich, \n Klägerin, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n A.________ GmbH, \n Beklagte, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Berufliche Vorsorge (Konventionalstrafe) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: