Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2022 16 • VG SZ II 2022 16 Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility

Numero d'incarto II 2022 16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant sought supplementary benefits, which involved scrutiny over a prior waiver of assets, leading to a second instance appeal against the decision of the compensation office. The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the prior disposal of assets, undertaken without full awareness of the long-term financial implications, constituted a voluntary renunciation of assets that precluded the claimant from immediately qualifying for the supplementary benefits, as the underlying condition for receiving such aid—that the claimant has exhausted their own means—was not met due to the avoidable disposition.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV; Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility: The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the prior disposal of assets, undertaken without full awareness of the long-term financial implications, constituted a voluntary renunciation of assets that precluded the claimant from immediately qualifying for the supplementary benefits, as the underlying condition for receiving such aid—that the claimant has exhausted their own means—was not met due to the avoidable disposition.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni complementari sostanza determinante condizione del diritto alla prestazione assicurativa indennità piena mezzi finanziari restituzione delle prestazioni

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV
This provision was cited in the dispositive to order the appellant to pay the court costs.
Generato dall'IA
II 2018 35
Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Decision on Asset Waiver
II 2016 76
Claimant v. Benefits Authority Regarding Asset Waiver
II 2020 86
Waiver of Assets for Supplementary Benefits
II 2018 24
Claimant v. Administrative Body re: Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV

This provision was cited in the dispositive to order the appellant to pay the court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 16 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Februar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht; 2. Rechtsgang \n im Verfahren II 2021 44) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: