Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2022 10 • VG SZ II 2022 10 Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Insurance Entitlement Cessation Due to Non-Compliance with Job Search Obligations

Numero d'incarto II 2022 10
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual appealed a decision by the labor office to cease unemployment insurance entitlement, where the core issue was whether the claimant had fulfilled their obligations while receiving benefits. The court reasoned that the claimant's failure to comply with instructions regarding job applications and subsequent failure to attend a required meeting constituted a breach of their duty to accept suitable employment and cooperate with the unemployment office, justifying the cessation of entitlement.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Insurance Entitlement Cessation Due to Non-Compliance with Job Search Obligations: The court reasoned that the claimant's failure to comply with instructions regarding job applications and subsequent failure to attend a required meeting constituted a breach of their duty to accept suitable employment and cooperate with the unemployment office, justifying the cessation of entitlement.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
violazione di obbligazioni contrattuali di lavoro diritto alle prestazioni soppressione delle prestazioni assicurative assicurazione di disoccupazione disoccupazione occupazione adeguata
Generato dall'IA
II 2018 40
Unemployment Benefits Termination for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2024 94
Unemployment Benefits Cessation Due to Insufficient Job Search Efforts
II 2020 48
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Cessation
II 2021 76
Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute)
II 2023 90
Unemployment Benefits Cessation for Insufficient Pre-Claim Job Search Efforts

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 10 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. April 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Milena Pesic, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: