Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2021 96 • VG SZ II 2021 96 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed: Survivors' Benefits and Damages Claim Against Social Insurance Institution

Numero d'incarto II 2021 96
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a social insurance institution's decision regarding survivors' benefits and a claim for damages under the Old Age and Survivors' Insurance scheme. The claimant, appealing an earlier decision, challenged the administrative actions concerning the survivor's benefits and sought compensation for alleged damages. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, thereby upholding the prior ruling, based on its interpretation of the relevant statutory provisions governing the insurance benefits and the lack of grounds to substantiate the claim for damages against the administrative body.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Dismissed: Survivors' Benefits and Damages Claim Against Social Insurance Institution: The claimant, appealing an earlier decision, challenged the administrative actions concerning the survivor's benefits and sought compensation for alleged damages. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, thereby upholding the prior ruling, based on its interpretation of the relevant statutory provisions governing the insurance benefits and the lack of grounds to substantiate the claim for damages against the administrative body.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
assicurazione per i superstiti prestazione d'assicurazione sociale ricorso per risarcimento danni assicurazione per la vecchiaia rinascita del diritto alla prestazione d'assicurazione prestazione statutaria

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant must bear the costs of the appeal procedure because the appeal was dismissed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 96 + 97 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Mai 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n 1. A.________ \n (Verfahren II 2021 96) |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Sozialversicherungsanstalt (SVA) Zürich, Röntgenstrasse 17, Postfach, 8087 Zürich, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Altersund Hinterlassenenversicherung (Schadenersatz gemäss