Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2021 9 • VG SZ II 2021 9 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Denial of Free Legal Aid for Supplementary Benefits Proceedings

Numero d'incarto II 2021 9
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party sought supplementary benefits and subsequently requested legal aid for the second instance of the appeal proceedings concerning the denial of those benefits. The lower court ruled against granting free legal aid, leading the party to appeal that decision. The court reasoned that the previous decision regarding the supplementary benefits was not so clearly favorable to the appellant that the refusal to grant legal aid could be deemed clearly incorrect, and since the appellant had not sufficiently demonstrated that they would be unable to bear the costs of the proceedings otherwise, the appeal against the denial of free legal aid was dismissed.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Denial of Free Legal Aid for Supplementary Benefits Proceedings: The lower court ruled against granting free legal aid, leading the party to appeal that decision. The court reasoned that the previous decision regarding the supplementary benefits was not so clearly favorable to the appellant that the refusal to grant legal aid could be deemed clearly incorrect, and since the appellant had not sufficiently demonstrated that they would be unable to bear the costs of the proceedings otherwise, the appeal against the denial of free legal aid was dismissed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura di gratuito patrocinio prestazione complementare procedura direttrice conseguimento fraudolento di una prestazione soppressione dell'aiuto sociale legittimazione a ricorrere
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 74
Appeal Regarding Denial of Free Legal Aid and Compensation
ZK2 2022 6
Legal Aid Denial Appeal Upheld
ZK2 2023 28
Appeal of Denial of Free Legal Aid Based on Merits of Underlying Claim
ZK2 2020 64
Appeal Against Denial of Legal Aid Based on Merit of Underlying Case
II 2022 56
Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Denial

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 9 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Februar 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (2. Rechtsgang im Verfahren II 2020 50: \n Unentgeltliche Rechtspflege) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: