Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAAn insured individual appealed a decision by the employment office to discontinue unemployment benefits due to insufficient job search efforts. The court reviewed the evidence concerning the claimant's reported job search activities and determined that the provided documentation failed to substantiate the required active efforts to secure employment within the specified period. Consequently, the court upheld the administrative decision, finding that the claimant did not meet the statutory obligations regarding active job seeking, which justified the cessation of benefits.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 65 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute): The court reviewed the evidence concerning the claimant's reported job search activities and determined that the provided documentation failed to substantiate the required active efforts to secure employment within the specified period. Consequently, the court upheld the administrative decision, finding that the claimant did not meet the statutory obligations regarding active job seeking, which justified the cessation of benefits.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appeal is dismissed because the appeal concerns a final decision that is not subject to appeal.
The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees.
Testo completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 76 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Oktober 2021 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung; ungenügende Arbeits-bemühungen) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: