Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2021 76 • VG SZ II 2021 76 Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute)

Numero d'incarto II 2021 76
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An insured individual appealed a decision by the employment office to discontinue unemployment benefits due to insufficient job search efforts. The court reviewed the evidence concerning the claimant's reported job search activities and determined that the provided documentation failed to substantiate the required active efforts to secure employment within the specified period. Consequently, the court upheld the administrative decision, finding that the claimant did not meet the statutory obligations regarding active job seeking, which justified the cessation of benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute): The court reviewed the evidence concerning the claimant's reported job search activities and determined that the provided documentation failed to substantiate the required active efforts to secure employment within the specified period. Consequently, the court upheld the administrative decision, finding that the claimant did not meet the statutory obligations regarding active job seeking, which justified the cessation of benefits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
indennità di disoccupazione cessazione delle prestazioni obbligo di cercare lavoro diritto alla prestazione d'assicurazione perdita dell'impiego causata disoccupazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is dismissed because the appeal concerns a final decision that is not subject to appeal.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 76 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Oktober 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung; ungenügende Arbeits-bemühungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: