Cantonal Compensation Fund Decision Upheld in Insurance Appeal
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAAn appellant challenged a decision by a cantonal compensation fund regarding a claim for old-age and survivor's insurance, specifically related to damages. The court ultimately upheld the fund's decision, reasoning that the appeal lacked merit because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the initial determination by the compensation fund regarding the insurance matter was legally flawed or factually incorrect.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 66 Abs. 1 BVG; Cantonal Compensation Fund Decision Upheld in Insurance Appeal: The court ultimately upheld the fund's decision, reasoning that the appeal lacked merit because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the initial determination by the compensation fund regarding the insurance matter was legally flawed or factually incorrect.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IACosts were imposed based on this provision, as indicated in the dispositive part (Order 3).
Testo completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 75 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. November 2021 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Altersund Hinterlassenenversicherung (Schadenersatz \n gemäss