Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2021 71 • VG SZ II 2021 71 Generato dall'IA

Claimant Insured Status and Premium Obligation Appeal

Numero d'incarto II 2021 71
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant challenged a decision regarding their insured status and a resulting premium demand. The court reviewed whether the claimant qualified as an insured person under the relevant insurance law, considering facts presented in the lower court's decision, and ultimately upheld the prior ruling, confirming the claimant's insured status and the associated premium obligation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG; Claimant Insured Status and Premium Obligation Appeal: The court reviewed whether the claimant qualified as an insured person under the relevant insurance law, considering facts presented in the lower court's decision, and ultimately upheld the prior ruling, confirming the claimant's insured status and the associated premium obligation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
qualità d'assicurato premio d'assicurazione surrogazione dell'assicuratore diritto delle obbligazioni condizione del diritto alla prestazione assicurativa vertenza di assicurazione sociale Versicherteneigenschaft; Prämienforderung | Verschiedenes

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG
The appeal was partially dismissed, requiring the appellant to pay the costs of the successful party.
Generato dall'IA
II 2018 91
Premium Reduction Eligibility Appeal
ZK1 2017 3
Life Insurance Policy Validity Dispute Appeal
II 2020 95
Claimant v. Insurer: Health Insurance Premium Arrears Enforcement
I 2020 23
Insured v. Insurance Company: Denial of Disability Benefits Appeal
I 2020 70
Insured v. Insurer (Accident Benefits Denial Reversal)

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

The appeal was partially dismissed, requiring the appellant to pay the costs of the successful party.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 71 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Januar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Simone Höfliger, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Suva, Versicherungstechnik, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, \n \n1. B.________, \n2. C.________, \n3. D.________, \n4. E.________, \n5. F.________, \n6. G.________, \n7. H.________, \n Beigeladene, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Versicherteneigenschaft; Prämienforderung |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: