Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2021 66 • VG SZ II 2021 66 Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Insurance Contribution Appeal: Employment Termination Proof

Numero d'incarto II 2021 66
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal challenging a decision by a lower court regarding a claim for unemployment insurance contributions, where the appellant argued that the employment relationship had ended before the period for which contributions were assessed. The court reasoned that the evidence failed to conclusively establish that the employment relationship had terminated before the relevant date, upholding the lower court's decision because the appellant did not sufficiently demonstrate the termination of the employment contract as required by law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Insurance Contribution Appeal: Employment Termination Proof: The court reasoned that the evidence failed to conclusively establish that the employment relationship had terminated before the relevant date, upholding the lower court's decision because the appellant did not sufficiently demonstrate the termination of the employment contract as required by law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cessazione d'impiego assicurazione di disoccupazione disoccupazione credito di contributi aiuti all'occupazione rapporto d'assicurazione Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19; Erwerbsersatz) | Erwerbsersatzordnung
Generato dall'IA
II 2020 51
Appeal Regarding Unemployment Benefits and Validity of Dismissal
II 2021 89
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Eligibility Appeal
II 2020 48
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Cessation
II 2021 102
Unemployment Insurance Eligibility Appeal
II 2025 60
Unemployment Insurance Benefits Denial Upheld Due to Insufficient Proof of Salary Payments

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 66 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Oktober 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ GmbH, St. Gallerstrasse 24, 8853 Lachen, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n GastroSocial Ausgleichskasse, Buchserstrasse 1, \n Postfach 2203, 5001 Aarau, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n