Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2021 39 • VG SZ II 2021 39 Generato dall'IA

Holding Company v. Tax Authority: Deductibility of Value Adjustments on Intercompany Loans

Numero d'incarto II 2021 39
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A holding company appealed the tax assessment for 2017 regarding the refusal to recognize value adjustments as tax-deductible expenses for profit and capital tax purposes. The court addressed whether the holding company could deduct value adjustments on intercompany loans that were fully covered by provisions, as the underlying receivable, though written down, was not legally irrecoverable, and the tax authority was correct in disallowing the deduction because the adjustments did not represent a realized loss or a definitive diminishment of value as required for tax deductibility under the applicable law at the time.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Holding Company v. Tax Authority: Deductibility of Value Adjustments on Intercompany Loans: The court addressed whether the holding company could deduct value adjustments on intercompany loans that were fully covered by provisions, as the underlying receivable, though written down, was not legally irrecoverable, and the tax authority was correct in disallowing the deduction because the adjustments did not represent a realized loss or a definitive diminishment of value as required for tax deductibility under the applicable law at the time.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rettifica delle detrazioni imposta sul capitale autorità fiscale tassazioni fiscali società holding mancato guadagno
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n

\n \n Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Schwyz \n Kammer II \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 39 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. April 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Thomas Twerenbold, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ Holding AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch …, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Kantonale Steuerkommission/Kantonale Verwaltung für die direkte Bundessteuer, Bahnhofstrasse 15, Postfach 1232, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Gewinnund Kapitalsteuer (Veranlagung 2017; Aufrechnung Wertberichtigungen) |\n \n\n

\n

\n Sachverhalt: