Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2021 30 • VG SZ II 2021 30 Generato dall'IA

Social Security Fund Appeal Regarding Investment Income Crediting

Numero d'incarto II 2021 30
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision by a social security fund regarding supplementary benefits, specifically the crediting of investment income against the entitlement. The appellant challenged the fund's calculation which included investment income when determining eligibility for supplementary benefits. The court ultimately upheld the lower instance's decision, reasoning that under the relevant law, income derived from assets, including investment income, must be considered when calculating the claimant's available resources to determine the final supplementary benefit amount.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Social Security Fund Appeal Regarding Investment Income Crediting: The appellant challenged the fund's calculation which included investment income when determining eligibility for supplementary benefits. The court ultimately upheld the lower instance's decision, reasoning that under the relevant law, income derived from assets, including investment income, must be considered when calculating the claimant's available resources to determine the final supplementary benefit amount.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni della sicurezza sociale reddito della sostanza fondo in valori mobiliari accredito supplementare vertenza di assicurazione sociale diritto alle prestazioni complementari Ergänzungsleistungen (Anrechnung von Vermögen) | Ergänzungsleistungen

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal judicial review proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 30 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. Mai 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marcel Käselau, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Anrechnung von Vermögensertrag) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: