Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2021 121 • VG SZ II 2021 121 Generato dall'IA

Occupational Pension Benefit Calculation Dispute

Numero d'incarto II 2021 121
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns a dispute over the amount of a pension benefit under a mandatory occupational benefit scheme, where the claimant appealed a decision regarding the calculation of her retirement pension. The court reasoned that the calculation of the vested benefits and the resulting pension was correct according to the applicable regulations governing occupational pensions, as the lower court's application of the statutory minimum standards and relevant plan provisions adequately determined the benefit amount in question.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Occupational Pension Benefit Calculation Dispute: The court reasoned that the calculation of the vested benefits and the resulting pension was correct according to the applicable regulations governing occupational pensions, as the lower court's application of the statutory minimum standards and relevant plan provisions adequately determined the benefit amount in question.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni di previdenza professionale calcolo della prestazione prestazione obbligatoria responsabilità dell'istituto di previdenza decisioni in materia di pensione di anzianità rendita minima Berufliche Vorsorge (Höhe der Rente) | Berufliche Vorsorge (ohne med. SV)
Generato dall'IA
I 2018 112
Occupational Pension Benefit Dispute
I 2016 83
Pension Fund Disability Benefit Calculation Dispute
II 2022 33
Pension Fund Over-Indemnification Calculation Dispute
II 2022 59
Pension Scheme Disability Rating Dispute
II 2019 91
Pension Fund v. Employer: Occupational Pension Contributions Dispute

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 121 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 18. Januar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Klägerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Stiftung C.________, \n Beklagte, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Berufliche Vorsorge (Höhe der Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: