Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2021 115 • VG SZ II 2021 115 Generato dall'IA

Supplementary Benefit Repayment Based on Subsequent Income

Numero d'incarto II 2021 115
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party sought supplementary benefits but was later required to repay a portion of the benefits received after the relevant income assessment period, as the initial calculation did not account for subsequent income earned during that period. The court reasoned that the obligation to repay supplementary benefits arises when the beneficiary receives income that, had it been known at the time of the benefit calculation, would have resulted in a lower benefit payment or no entitlement at all, thus upholding the administrative decision to reclaim the overpaid amount based on the subsequent income realization.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Supplementary Benefit Repayment Based on Subsequent Income: The court reasoned that the obligation to repay supplementary benefits arises when the beneficiary receives income that, had it been known at the time of the benefit calculation, would have resulted in a lower benefit payment or no entitlement at all, thus upholding the administrative decision to reclaim the overpaid amount based on the subsequent income realization.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto alle prestazioni complementari calcolo della prestazione determinazione del reddito restituzione delle indennità di disoccupazione retribuzione del lavoro pagamento continuato del salario Ergänzungsleistungen (Rückforderung) | Ergänzungsleistungen
Generato dall'IA
II 2020 22
Benefits Authority v. Spouse's Actual Income in Supplementary Benefits Calculation
II 2018 33
Supplementary Benefits Calculation: Hypothetical Income Imputation for Non-Working Spouse
II 2021 88
Spousal Income Imputation in Supplementary Benefits Calculation
II 2020 33
Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Office (Repayment of Overpaid Benefits Due to Undisclosed Inheritance)
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 115 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Februar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Milena Pesic, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Rückforderung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: