Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2021 114 • VG SZ II 2021 114 Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Equalisation Office: Denial of Supplementary Dental Benefits

Numero d'incarto II 2021 114
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant sought supplementary benefits for dental treatment costs, which were denied by the relevant equalization office. The claimant appealed this decision, arguing that the denied treatment was medically necessary. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that while essential dental treatment is covered, the specific treatments sought were considered cosmetic or non-essential by established medical standards and regulations governing supplementary benefits, thus not meeting the threshold for mandatory coverage.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Equalisation Office: Denial of Supplementary Dental Benefits: The claimant appealed this decision, arguing that the denied treatment was medically necessary. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that while essential dental treatment is covered, the specific treatments sought were considered cosmetic or non-essential by established medical standards and regulations governing supplementary benefits, thus not meeting the threshold for mandatory coverage.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni complementari trattamento medico assicurazione di cure dentarie domanda di prestazione d'assicurazione conguaglio disparità di trattamento Ergänzungsleistungen (Zahnbehandlungskosten) | Ergänzungsleistungen
Generato dall'IA
II 2019 11
Supplementary Benefits Recipient's Appeal for Dental Cost Coverage Dismissed Due to Procedural Non-Compliance
II 2019 32
Social Security Denial of Supplementary Dental Coverage Upheld
II 2019 52
Social Security Dental Benefits Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Cost Estimate
I 2023 35
Insurer Denied Dental Coverage Over Causation Dispute; Court Remands for Further Investigation
I 2025 8
Claimant v. Accident Insurance Denied for Secondary Dental Injury

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 114 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Januar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Milena Pesic, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Zahnbehandlungskosten) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: