Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2020 86 • VG SZ II 2020 86 Generato dall'IA

Waiver of Assets for Supplementary Benefits

Numero d'incarto II 2020 86
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The dispute concerns a claim for supplementary benefits where the claimant appealed a decision regarding the mandatory waiver of assets. The court reasoned that for supplementary benefits to be granted, an applicant who has relinquished assets (a voluntary transfer of ownership, in this case, a house) must demonstrate that the transfer was not made to obtain the benefit, and if the transfer was made within the legally stipulated timeframe preceding the benefit application, the burden of proof shifts to the applicant to show that the disposal was not made for the purpose of obtaining benefits, which the applicant failed to do.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG; Waiver of Assets for Supplementary Benefits: The court reasoned that for supplementary benefits to be granted, an applicant who has relinquished assets (a voluntary transfer of ownership, in this case, a house) must demonstrate that the transfer was not made to obtain the benefit, and if the transfer was made within the legally stipulated timeframe preceding the benefit application, the burden of proof shifts to the applicant to show that the disposal was not made for the purpose of obtaining benefits, which the applicant failed to do.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni complementari trasferimento di patrimonio rinuncia alle prestazioni d'assicurazione prova della proprietà onere della prova divieto di cumulo delle prestazioni Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs because her appeal was dismissed.
Generato dall'IA
II 2022 16
Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility
II 2018 35
Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Decision on Asset Waiver
II 2020 42
Supplementary Benefits Asset Waiver Validity Appeal
II 2018 43
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2016 76
Claimant v. Benefits Authority Regarding Asset Waiver

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs because her appeal was dismissed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 86 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. November 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: