Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2020 85 • VG SZ II 2020 85 Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets

Numero d'incarto II 2020 85
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision regarding supplementary benefits, specifically concerning the waiver of assets, debts, and property income, after the initial authority determined that the claimant's assets, including an apartment occupied by the claimant and their spouse, were not fully exhausted or deemed inconsequential for benefit eligibility. The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the retained asset value, derived from an apartment whose value was not sufficiently offset by the stated debts, meant the claimant's assets still exceeded the threshold for receiving supplementary benefits, thereby affirming the denial of the benefit claim.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets: The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the retained asset value, derived from an apartment whose value was not sufficiently offset by the stated debts, meant the claimant's assets still exceeded the threshold for receiving supplementary benefits, thereby affirming the denial of the benefit claim.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni complementari reddito della sostanza rinuncia al reddito condizione del diritto alla prestazione assicurativa immobile occupato restituzione delle prestazioni
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 85 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 15. Dezember 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht / Schulden / \n Liegenschaftseinnahmen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: