Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2020 78 • VG SZ II 2020 78 Generato dall'IA

Cantonal Equalization Office v. Appellant (COVID-19 Loss of Earnings Compensation)

Numero d'incarto II 2020 78
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant sought reimbursement under the COVID-19 loss of earnings compensation scheme for the period from April 1 to June 30, 2020, after their self-employment income dropped below a certain threshold due to the pandemic, but the relevant cantonal equalization office denied the claim on the basis that the necessary income reduction was not definitively established for the entire three-month period under the applicable regulations. The court reasoned that for the purpose of establishing the income loss for the specific three-month period mandated by the relevant regulation, it was necessary to demonstrate that the required income threshold was met across the entire period, and since the evidence only showed an income reduction for a portion of that time, the overall claim for the quarter could not be granted.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Cantonal Equalization Office v. Appellant (COVID-19 Loss of Earnings Compensation): The court reasoned that for the purpose of establishing the income loss for the specific three-month period mandated by the relevant regulation, it was necessary to demonstrate that the required income threshold was met across the entire period, and since the evidence only showed an income reduction for a portion of that time, the overall claim for the quarter could not be granted.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
indennità per perdita guadagno diminuzione del reddito reddito di un'attività lucrativa indipendente indennità giornaliera di malattia pagamento continuato del salario versamento della prestazione d'assicurazione Erwerbsersatzordnung (COVID-19 Erwerbsersatz) | Erwerbsersatzordnung
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 78 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Oktober 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Christina Zehnder, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Erwerbsersatzordnung (COVID-19 Erwerbsersatz) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: