Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2020 70 • VG SZ II 2020 70 Generato dall'IA

Insured Person v. Equalization Office: Contribution Assessment for Ceased Self-Employment

Numero d'incarto II 2020 70
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An insured person, having ceased self-employment activities in 2015, contested a decision by the equalization office to assess and demand contributions for the year 2016 based on the status of being self-employed, arguing that they had not engaged in any such activity that year. The court found that the insured person had failed to demonstrate that they had genuinely ceased all self-employment activities, noting that continued activity, even minor, could justify the continued classification as self-employed and the corresponding contribution assessment, thus upholding the equalization office's decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG; Insured Person v. Equalization Office: Contribution Assessment for Ceased Self-Employment: The court found that the insured person had failed to demonstrate that they had genuinely ceased all self-employment activities, noting that continued activity, even minor, could justify the continued classification as self-employed and the corresponding contribution assessment, thus upholding the equalization office's decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
attività lucrativa indipendente qualità d'assicurato fissazione dei contributi persone esercitanti un'attività lucrativa valutazione del reddito abbandono del posto di lavoro

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

The appeal was dismissed, requiring the appellant to bear the costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 70 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Oktober 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Altersund Hinterlassenenversicherung (Beiträge 2016: \n Beitragsstatus) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: