Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2020 69 • VG SZ II 2020 69 Generato dall'IA

Supplementary Benefit Asset Valuation Appeal

Numero d'incarto II 2020 69
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision regarding supplementary benefits, specifically concerning the crediting of a loan or waiver of assets against their entitlement. The court reasoned that a loan provided to the claimant by a third party, which was structured as a repayment obligation, qualified as an asset for the purpose of calculating supplementary benefits, thereby justifying the reduction or denial of the benefits, as the claimant possessed a realizable asset despite the arrangement.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV; Supplementary Benefit Asset Valuation Appeal: The court reasoned that a loan provided to the claimant by a third party, which was structured as a repayment obligation, qualified as an asset for the purpose of calculating supplementary benefits, thereby justifying the reduction or denial of the benefits, as the claimant possessed a realizable asset despite the arrangement.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto alle prestazioni complementari riduzione delle prestazioni valutazione degli attivi rimborso del mutuo legittimazione a ricorrere procedura di ricupero d'imposta Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV
The final order mandates the appellant to pay court costs.
Generato dall'IA
II 2018 43
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2018 35
Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Decision on Asset Waiver
II 2024 107
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefit Denial Due to Asset Valuation of Partially Rented Property
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets
II 2020 42
Supplementary Benefits Asset Waiver Validity Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV

The final order mandates the appellant to pay court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 69 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. November 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Anrechnung eines Darlehens/ Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: