Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2020 51 • VG SZ II 2020 51 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Unemployment Benefits and Validity of Dismissal

Numero d'incarto II 2020 51
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal against a decision by the employment office's unemployment insurance fund regarding the claimant's entitlement to unemployment benefits following the termination of their employment, where the central issue was the validity of the dismissal and the resulting eligibility for benefits. The court reasoned that the factual circumstances, including the reasons for the termination, did not support the lower authority's conclusion that the claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits, thereby partially or fully overturning the previous decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Unemployment Benefits and Validity of Dismissal: The court reasoned that the factual circumstances, including the reasons for the termination, did not support the lower authority's conclusion that the claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits, thereby partially or fully overturning the previous decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto all'indennità di disoccupazione cessazione d'impiego diritto alle prestazioni assicurative rinascita del diritto alla prestazione d'assicurazione cassa di disoccupazione disoccupazione
Generato dall'IA
II 2021 89
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Eligibility Appeal
II 2020 48
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Cessation
II 2025 47
Claimant v. Employment Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal
II 2025 38
Appeal Against Suspension of Unemployment Benefits for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2021 66
Unemployment Insurance Contribution Appeal: Employment Termination Proof

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 51 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Juli 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Arbeitslosenkasse, Lückenstrasse 8, \n Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n