Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2020 50 • VG SZ II 2020 50 Generato dall'IA

Social Insurance Benefits and Imputed Spousal Income

Numero d'incarto II 2020 50
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision by the social insurance institution that calculated supplementary benefits based on a hypothetical earned income for the claimant's spouse, asserting the spouse had voluntarily foregone income. The court reasoned that such an imputation of hypothetical income is permissible under the law to prevent individuals from deliberately reducing their means to qualify for higher benefits, provided the voluntary foregone income is substantial and not based on valid reasons like caring for children or other duties impacting earning capacity.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Social Insurance Benefits and Imputed Spousal Income: The court reasoned that such an imputation of hypothetical income is permissible under the law to prevent individuals from deliberately reducing their means to qualify for higher benefits, provided the voluntary foregone income is substantial and not based on valid reasons like caring for children or other duties impacting earning capacity.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
computo del reddito ipotetico prestazione d'assicurazione sociale reddito del coniuge assicurazione complementare capacità di guadagno ridotta rendita d'invalidità per coniugi
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 50 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. September 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Aaron Steiner, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (hypothetisches Erwerbseinkommen \n der Ehefrau) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: