Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2019 96 • VG SZ II 2019 96 Generato dall'IA

Company v. Civil Engineering Office Regarding Benefit Levy for Reconstruction

Numero d'incarto II 2019 96
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company appealed a decision by the civil engineering office concerning causality-based charges levied after receiving a building permit for the demolition and reconstruction of a structure, specifically challenging a benefit levy. The court considered whether the nature of the charges imposed by the authority, stemming from the building permit granting rights for a new construction on the site of a demolished one, constituted a fee or levy based on specific benefits derived from the governmental action, ultimately upholding the imposition of the benefit levy based on the relevant legal framework concerning development charges.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Company v. Civil Engineering Office Regarding Benefit Levy for Reconstruction: The court considered whether the nature of the charges imposed by the authority, stemming from the building permit granting rights for a new construction on the site of a demolished one, constituted a fee or levy based on specific benefits derived from the governmental action, ultimately upholding the imposition of the benefit levy based on the relevant legal framework concerning development charges.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
imprese di costruzione permesso di demolizione contributi di urbanizzazione contratto di genio civile struttura dell'impresa diritto di ricostruire
Generato dall'IA
II 2024 11
Construction Company Benefit Levy Challenge
ZK1 2019 10
Property Owners' Association v. Construction Company (Structural Damage and Unauthorized Encroachment)
II 2017 42
Company v. Local Council: Benefit Levy Appeal
III 2018 74
Appeal Concerning Construction Permit Legality
III 2022 139
Public Procurement Appeal Over Flawed Civil Engineering Works Award

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 96 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 8. April 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Tiefbauamt, Postfach 1251, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kausalabgaben (Baubewilligung Abbruch und Neubau: \n Vorteilsabgabe) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: