Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2019 95 • VG SZ II 2019 95 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Military Service Obligation Status Confirmation

Numero d'incarto II 2019 95
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party appealed a decision regarding a military service matter, where the core issue involved the appellant's status relative to military obligations following a prior administrative action. The court reviewed the procedural history and the substance of the objection against the administrative ruling concerning military duties. The court ultimately upheld the lower authority's decision, reasoning that the previous administrative findings regarding the party's eligibility or status for military service were correctly applied and did not constitute a violation of applicable law or procedural fairness in the context of the appellant's challenge.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Military Service Obligation Status Confirmation: The court reviewed the procedural history and the substance of the objection against the administrative ruling concerning military duties. The court ultimately upheld the lower authority's decision, reasoning that the previous administrative findings regarding the party's eligibility or status for military service were correctly applied and did not constitute a violation of applicable law or procedural fairness in the context of the appellant's challenge.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
servizio militare posizioni amministrative azione di stato civile dovere procedurale diritto delle obbligazioni impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio Wehrpflichtersatz (Wehrpflichtersatzabgabe 2018) | Wehrpflichtersatz
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 95 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. Februar 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Dennis Feusi, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. Amt für Militär, Feuerund Zivilschutz, Schlagstrasse 87, \n Postfach 4215, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n

\n\n

\n