Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2019 9 • VG SZ II 2019 9 Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Recovery Due to Concurrent Retirement Allowance

Numero d'incarto II 2019 9
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerned an appeal against a decision by the unemployment insurance fund regarding the crediting of a retirement benefit and subsequent recovery of benefits. The appellant had received unemployment insurance benefits but was later required to repay them because they had also received a retirement allowance. The court reasoned that the receipt of the retirement benefit, which was designed to replace earned income, disqualified the individual from simultaneously receiving unemployment insurance benefits intended for those who are involuntarily unemployed and available for work, thereby justifying the fund's decision to reclaim the paid benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Recovery Due to Concurrent Retirement Allowance: The appellant had received unemployment insurance benefits but was later required to repay them because they had also received a retirement allowance. The court reasoned that the receipt of the retirement benefit, which was designed to replace earned income, disqualified the individual from simultaneously receiving unemployment insurance benefits intended for those who are involuntarily unemployed and available for work, thereby justifying the fund's decision to reclaim the paid benefits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazione dell'assicurazione contro la disoccupazione pensionamento reddito di un'attività lucrativa disoccupazione cassa di assicurazione restituzione delle prestazioni
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 9 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. April 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________ (Arbeitslosenkasse), \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Anrechnung einer Altersleistung; \n Rückforderung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: