Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2019 83 • VG SZ II 2019 83 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Lawful Termination of Employment Due to Management Prerogatives and Employee Non-Cooperation

Numero d'incarto II 2019 83
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company challenged a decision regarding the termination of an employment relationship, where the lower court upheld the termination based on the employer's right to manage its business and the employee's failure to cooperate, despite the employee disputing the factual basis for the termination. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower court's factual findings, supported by evidence, were not demonstrably incorrect or arbitrary, thus affirming the legality of the termination based on the established facts concerning the employment relationship dynamics and management prerogatives.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Lawful Termination of Employment Due to Management Prerogatives and Employee Non-Cooperation: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower court's factual findings, supported by evidence, were not demonstrably incorrect or arbitrary, thus affirming the legality of the termination based on the established facts concerning the employment relationship dynamics and management prerogatives.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cessazione d'impiego accertamento inesatto dei fatti relazione commerciale diritto di sciopero validità del divieto di concorrenza doveri e diritti dell'agente Arbeitszeitregelung für Tankstellenshop | Verschiedenes
Generato dall'IA
ZK1 2017 38
Employee Termination Upheld Despite Discrimination Allegations
III 2022 31
Wrongful Termination Dispute
ZK1 2017 25
Appeal of Employment Dispute Judgment
ZK1 2024 9
Contract Termination Appeal
ZK1 2016 42
Employer Appeal Dismissed Regarding Crediting of Post-Termination Earnings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 83 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Dezember 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ GmbH, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, 2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n