Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2019 75 • VG SZ II 2019 75 Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Benefits Agency on Asset Relinquishment for Supplementary Benefits

Numero d'incarto II 2019 75
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant, appealing a decision regarding supplementary benefits, challenged a requirement to relinquish assets, arguing that the relevant provision did not apply to assets derived from the liquidation of a primary residence since they were intended for the acquisition of a new dwelling. The court reasoned that the relevant statutory provision required the surrender of all assets exceeding the statutory minimum for supplementary benefit eligibility, regardless of the intended future use of the liquidated asset proceeds, thereby upholding the decision of the lower instance that mandated the claimant's asset divestment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Claimant v. Benefits Agency on Asset Relinquishment for Supplementary Benefits: The court reasoned that the relevant statutory provision required the surrender of all assets exceeding the statutory minimum for supplementary benefit eligibility, regardless of the intended future use of the liquidated asset proceeds, thereby upholding the decision of the lower instance that mandated the claimant's asset divestment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rinuncia alla sostanza prestazioni complementari diritto alla prestazione d'assicurazione riduzione delle prestazioni prestazioni minime prestazione statutaria Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited in the dispositive to regulate the court costs for the appeal.
Generato dall'IA
II 2016 76
Claimant v. Benefits Authority Regarding Asset Waiver
II 2018 35
Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Decision on Asset Waiver
II 2018 43
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets
II 2022 16
Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited in the dispositive to regulate the court costs for the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 75 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Februar 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Dennis Feusi, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: