Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2019 68 • VG SZ II 2019 68 Generato dall'IA

Plaintiff v. Pension Fund and Bankruptcy Office Claim Priority Dispute

Numero d'incarto II 2019 68
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A plaintiff sued a pension fund and a bankruptcy office, likely concerning a claim arising from insolvency proceedings, where the central dispute involved the priority or entitlement to certain assets or claims held by the defendant pension fund. The court's reasoning, though not fully detailed in the excerpt, would involve interpreting relevant statutory provisions regarding pension fund obligations, creditor rights in bankruptcy, and the specific contractual or legal basis of the plaintiff's claim against the fund to determine the proper outcome of the litigation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Plaintiff v. Pension Fund and Bankruptcy Office Claim Priority Dispute: The court's reasoning, though not fully detailed in the excerpt, would involve interpreting relevant statutory provisions regarding pension fund obligations, creditor rights in bankruptcy, and the specific contractual or legal basis of the plaintiff's claim against the fund to determine the proper outcome of the litigation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
privilegio nel fallimento diritto alla rendita fondo pensionistico diritti e obblighi contrattuali controversia di sicurezza sociale base legale
Generato dall'IA
II 2018 107
Pension Institution v. Employer: Recovery of Unpaid Pension Contributions
II 2019 91
Pension Fund v. Employer: Occupational Pension Contributions Dispute
II 2019 2
Pension Fund v. Employer: Unsubstantiated Dispute Over Pension Contributions
I 2017 76
Pension Fund Benefit Reduction Notice Dispute
ZK 2006 74
Managing Director Wage Priority in Bankruptcy

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 68 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. Februar 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Klägerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. C.________ (Vorsorgestiftung), \n Beklagte, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, \n2. Konkursamt E.________, \n Beigeladene, \n |\n

\n\n

\n