Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2019 67 • VG SZ II 2019 67 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Social Security Premium Reduction Calculation

Numero d'incarto II 2019 67
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision regarding the amount of premium reduction granted by a social security fund. The claimant had requested an increase in the subsidized health insurance premiums based on their financial situation, but the administrative body denied the increase, leading to the appeal concerning the proper calculation and allocation of the premium reduction. The court upheld the initial decision, reasoning that the administrative body correctly applied the legal criteria for calculating the premium reduction based on the presented financial facts and that there was no legal basis to justify the claimant's requested higher subsidy amount.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Social Security Premium Reduction Calculation: The claimant had requested an increase in the subsidized health insurance premiums based on their financial situation, but the administrative body denied the increase, leading to the appeal concerning the proper calculation and allocation of the premium reduction. The court upheld the initial decision, reasoning that the administrative body correctly applied the legal criteria for calculating the premium reduction based on the presented financial facts and that there was no legal basis to justify the claimant's requested higher subsidy amount.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
riduzione dei contributi cassa di compensazione assicurazione malattia premio d'assicurazione preavviso in materia di assicurazioni sociali organo dell'assicurazione contro le malattie Prämienverbilligung (Höhe der Prämienverbilligung) | Prämienverbilligung
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 67 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. November 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Dennis Feusi, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Prämienverbilligung (Höhe der Prämienverbilligung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: