Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2019 62 • VG SZ II 2019 62 Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Benefits Cessation Due to Failure to Seek Work After Relocation

Numero d'incarto II 2019 62
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant challenged a decision by the employment office regarding the cessation of entitlement to unemployment benefits. The appellant had previously received unemployment insurance benefits but subsequently relocated and reported difficulty finding new employment in the new location. The court reasoned that the obligation to accept suitable employment is a central tenet of the unemployment insurance scheme, and the appellant’s failure to actively seek employment within a reasonable radius of their residence and to cooperate with placement efforts justified the discontinuation of benefits, as the duty to seek work remains irrespective of a change in residence.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Unemployment Benefits Cessation Due to Failure to Seek Work After Relocation: The appellant had previously received unemployment insurance benefits but subsequently relocated and reported difficulty finding new employment in the new location. The court reasoned that the obligation to accept suitable employment is a central tenet of the unemployment insurance scheme, and the appellant’s failure to actively seek employment within a reasonable radius of their residence and to cooperate with placement efforts justified the discontinuation of benefits, as the duty to seek work remains irrespective of a change in residence.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
indennità di disoccupazione obbligo di cercare lavoro cessazione delle prestazioni diritto alle prestazioni assicurative cambiamento di dimora perdita dell'impiego causata

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Imposed costs on the appeal filed by the appellant.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 62 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. November 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Dennis Feusi, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n Dr. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: