Unemployment Benefits Cessation Due to Failure to Seek Work After Relocation
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAAn appellant challenged a decision by the employment office regarding the cessation of entitlement to unemployment benefits. The appellant had previously received unemployment insurance benefits but subsequently relocated and reported difficulty finding new employment in the new location. The court reasoned that the obligation to accept suitable employment is a central tenet of the unemployment insurance scheme, and the appellant’s failure to actively seek employment within a reasonable radius of their residence and to cooperate with placement efforts justified the discontinuation of benefits, as the duty to seek work remains irrespective of a change in residence.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Unemployment Benefits Cessation Due to Failure to Seek Work After Relocation: The appellant had previously received unemployment insurance benefits but subsequently relocated and reported difficulty finding new employment in the new location. The court reasoned that the obligation to accept suitable employment is a central tenet of the unemployment insurance scheme, and the appellant’s failure to actively seek employment within a reasonable radius of their residence and to cooperate with placement efforts justified the discontinuation of benefits, as the duty to seek work remains irrespective of a change in residence.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAImposed costs on the appeal filed by the appellant.
Testo completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 62 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. November 2019 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Dennis Feusi, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n Dr. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: