Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2019 52 • VG SZ II 2019 52 Generato dall'IA

Social Security Dental Benefits Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Cost Estimate

Numero d'incarto II 2019 52
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant sought supplementary benefits to cover the costs of dental treatment, which was denied by the social security fund in the first instance. The court reasoned that since the appellant failed to submit an estimate of the dental treatment costs as required for a comprehensive assessment of the necessity and appropriateness of the treatment, the appeal lacked the necessary factual basis for review, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Social Security Dental Benefits Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Cost Estimate: The court reasoned that since the appellant failed to submit an estimate of the dental treatment costs as required for a comprehensive assessment of the necessity and appropriateness of the treatment, the appeal lacked the necessary factual basis for review, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni della sicurezza sociale preventivo assicurazione di cure dentarie prestazione di garanzia domanda di prestazione d'assicurazione condono delle spese procedurali Ergänzungsleistungen (Kosten Zahnbehandlung) | Ergänzungsleistungen
Generato dall'IA
II 2019 32
Social Security Denial of Supplementary Dental Coverage Upheld
II 2019 11
Supplementary Benefits Recipient's Appeal for Dental Cost Coverage Dismissed Due to Procedural Non-Compliance
II 2024 63
Dental Treatment Reimbursement Appeal Dismissed
II 2021 114
Claimant v. Equalisation Office: Denial of Supplementary Dental Benefits
I 2017 102
Dental Coverage Denial Appeal for Myasthenia Gravis

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 52 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. August 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Kosten Zahnbehandlung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: