Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2019 51 • VG SZ II 2019 51 Generato dall'IA

Taxpayer v. Cantonal Tax Commission (2015 Income Tax Assessment on Securities Trading)

Numero d'incarto II 2019 51
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a dispute over income and wealth tax assessment for the year 2015, specifically concerning whether the taxpayer was engaged in professional securities trading. The taxpayer appealed the cantonal tax commission's decision regarding the assessment. The court ultimately ruled on the matter, upholding or overturning the previous ruling based on the determination of whether the taxpayer's securities transactions qualified as professional trading activity under tax law, which typically hinges on the volume, frequency, and intent behind the transactions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Taxpayer v. Cantonal Tax Commission (2015 Income Tax Assessment on Securities Trading): The taxpayer appealed the cantonal tax commission's decision regarding the assessment. The court ultimately ruled on the matter, upholding or overturning the previous ruling based on the determination of whether the taxpayer's securities transactions qualified as professional trading activity under tax law, which typically hinges on the volume, frequency, and intent behind the transactions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
tassazione della sostanza imponibile commercio di titoli operazioni imponibili accertamento del reddito oggetto della lite imposta sui redditi da capitale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

This provision was cited in the dispositive to regulate the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 51 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. Juni 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Kantonale Steuerkommission/Kantonale Verwaltung für die direkte Bundessteuer, Bahnhofstrasse 15, Postfach 1232, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Einkommensund Vermögenssteuer (Veranlagung 2015; \n gewerbsmässiger Wertschriftenhandel) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: