Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2019 5 • VG SZ II 2019 5 Generato dall'IA

Insured Fails to Overturn Premium Surcharge Due to Presumed Receipt of Official Notice

Numero d'incarto II 2019 5
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision concerning premium surcharges for late premium payments, arguing that the administrative office did not provide sufficient notice of the deadline. The court reasoned that the administrative office's obligation to inform the insured party about the deadlines for premium surcharges was fulfilled when it sent an official notice, even if the insured party claimed not to have received it, as the timely receipt of such official communications is generally presumed unless there is evidence to the contrary, thereby upholding the decision regarding the missed deadline.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Insured Fails to Overturn Premium Surcharge Due to Presumed Receipt of Official Notice: The court reasoned that the administrative office's obligation to inform the insured party about the deadlines for premium surcharges was fulfilled when it sent an official notice, even if the insured party claimed not to have received it, as the timely receipt of such official communications is generally presumed unless there is evidence to the contrary, thereby upholding the decision regarding the missed deadline.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
premio supplementare inosservanza del termine inadempimento dell'assicuratore versamento della prestazione d'assicurazione spese di mora vertenza di assicurazione sociale Prämienverbilligung (Fristversäumnis) | Prämienverbilligung
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 5 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. März 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Postadresse: B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Prämienverbilligung (Fristversäumnis) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: