Unemployment Insurance Fund v. Applicant (Vocational Training as Insured Activity)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAAn applicant appealed a decision by the labor office's unemployment insurance fund regarding the denial of unemployment benefits, alleging the fund wrongly considered a period of vocational training as an insured activity, thereby failing to meet the required insurance period for eligibility. The court reasoned that the relevant legislation defines insured activity broadly to include vocational training, and since the applicant had completed this training, the prerequisite for receiving benefits had been met, thus overturning the lower instance's decision.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAUnemployment Insurance Fund v. Applicant (Vocational Training as Insured Activity): The court reasoned that the relevant legislation defines insured activity broadly to include vocational training, and since the applicant had completed this training, the prerequisite for receiving benefits had been met, thus overturning the lower instance's decision.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 47 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. August 2019 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Arbeitslosenkasse, Lückenstrasse 8, \n Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n