Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2019 42 • VG SZ II 2019 42 Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Benefits Denial Upheld Due to Insufficient Medical Evidence

Numero d'incarto II 2019 42
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant challenged a decision by the unemployment insurance fund denying continued receipt of benefits following a job separation, arguing that the separation was not their fault because they were unable to return to their prior role due to ongoing health issues stemming from an earlier work-related injury. The court upheld the fund's decision, reasoning that the claimant failed to meet the required standard of providing adequate evidence demonstrating an objective inability to return to the previously held position or that the necessary vocational rehabilitation measures had been exhausted or were unattainable, thus failing to establish that the benefit denial was unwarranted.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Benefits Denial Upheld Due to Insufficient Medical Evidence: The court upheld the fund's decision, reasoning that the claimant failed to meet the required standard of providing adequate evidence demonstrating an objective inability to return to the previously held position or that the necessary vocational rehabilitation measures had been exhausted or were unattainable, thus failing to establish that the benefit denial was unwarranted.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazione dell'assicurazione contro la disoccupazione mezzi di prova medici disoccupazione riabilitazione professionale assicurazione malattia soppressione di prestazioni d'invalidità
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 42 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. September 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Unia Arbeitslosenkasse, Kompetenzzentrum D-CH West, \n Monbijoustrasse 61, Postfach 3398, 3001 Bern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n

\n\n

\n