Supplementary Benefits Denial Based on Asset Ownership Refusal
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appeal concerned the denial of supplementary benefits due to the claimant's refusal to waive ownership of an asset. The court reasoned that the relevant law permits the refusal of supplementary benefits when the applicant disposes of assets without legitimate reason, and the forfeiture of an asset, even if for a seemingly non-monetary consideration, can be deemed a disposal without legitimate reason if it results in an undue burden on the social security system, thus upholding the prior decision regarding the ineligibility for benefits.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IASupplementary Benefits Denial Based on Asset Ownership Refusal: The court reasoned that the relevant law permits the refusal of supplementary benefits when the applicant disposes of assets without legitimate reason, and the forfeiture of an asset, even if for a seemingly non-monetary consideration, can be deemed a disposal without legitimate reason if it results in an undue burden on the social security system, thus upholding the prior decision regarding the ineligibility for benefits.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 30 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Mai 2019 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: