Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2019 30 • VG SZ II 2019 30 Generato dall'IA

Supplementary Benefits Denial Based on Asset Ownership Refusal

Numero d'incarto II 2019 30
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appeal concerned the denial of supplementary benefits due to the claimant's refusal to waive ownership of an asset. The court reasoned that the relevant law permits the refusal of supplementary benefits when the applicant disposes of assets without legitimate reason, and the forfeiture of an asset, even if for a seemingly non-monetary consideration, can be deemed a disposal without legitimate reason if it results in an undue burden on the social security system, thus upholding the prior decision regarding the ineligibility for benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Supplementary Benefits Denial Based on Asset Ownership Refusal: The court reasoned that the relevant law permits the refusal of supplementary benefits when the applicant disposes of assets without legitimate reason, and the forfeiture of an asset, even if for a seemingly non-monetary consideration, can be deemed a disposal without legitimate reason if it results in an undue burden on the social security system, thus upholding the prior decision regarding the ineligibility for benefits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
perenzione prestazioni complementari sostanza prestazione sociale revoca del trasferimento patrimoniale condizione del diritto alla prestazione assicurativa Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 30 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Mai 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: