Waiver of Assets as Improper Disposal for Benefit Eligibility
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appellant sought supplementary benefits but was denied because the relevant compensation fund considered a voluntary waiver of assets made prior to the application to be a form of self-provision that precluded eligibility. The court reasoned that a voluntary renunciation of assets, even if made before the benefit application, constitutes an improper disposal of assets if the purpose was to gain access to supplementary benefits, thus justifying the denial of those benefits under the relevant social security law.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Waiver of Assets as Improper Disposal for Benefit Eligibility: The court reasoned that a voluntary renunciation of assets, even if made before the benefit application, constitutes an improper disposal of assets if the purpose was to gain access to supplementary benefits, thus justifying the denial of those benefits under the relevant social security law.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.
Testo completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 20 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Mai 2019 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.oec. HSG B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: