Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2019 1 • VG SZ II 2019 1 Generato dall'IA

Corporate Taxpayer v. Holding Privilege Application Period

Numero d'incarto II 2019 1
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A corporate taxpayer challenged its capital tax assessment for the year 2014 regarding the application of the holding privilege, which grants exemptions for income and capital participation derived from qualifying subsidiary holdings. The court reasoned that for the holding privilege to apply, the required minimum participation threshold in the subsidiary must be met for the entire relevant tax period, specifically at the time the income arises and when the tax liability is determined, and since the statutory participation percentage was not continuously met throughout the entire tax period, the prerequisite for the tax privilege was not satisfied, thus upholding the assessment against the taxpayer.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Corporate Taxpayer v. Holding Privilege Application Period: The court reasoned that for the holding privilege to apply, the required minimum participation threshold in the subsidiary must be met for the entire relevant tax period, specifically at the time the income arises and when the tax liability is determined, and since the statutory participation percentage was not continuously met throughout the entire tax period, the prerequisite for the tax privilege was not satisfied, thus upholding the assessment against the taxpayer.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
imposta sull'utile delle aziende franchigie fiscali assoggettamento del contribuente reddito determinante deduzione in funzione della durata del possesso privilegio di responsabilità
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 1 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. Oktober 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Thomas Twerenbold, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n X.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch … , |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Kantonale Steuerkommission/Kantonale Verwaltung für die direkte Bundessteuer, Bahnhofstrasse 15, Postfach 1232, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Gewinnund Kapitalsteuer (Veranlagung 2014; Holdingprivileg) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: