Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2018 92 • VG SZ II 2018 92 Generato dall'IA

Policyholder Premium Non-Payment Insurance Termination Upheld

Numero d'incarto II 2018 92
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A policyholder sought court review after an insurer terminated their mandatory sickness daily allowance insurance policy under the Federal Health Insurance Act, following the policyholder's failure to pay outstanding premiums. The court determined that the insurer was entitled to terminate the contract because the policyholder had not fulfilled their obligation to pay the premiums, as required by the statutory insurance framework, and therefore upheld the termination.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Policyholder Premium Non-Payment Insurance Termination Upheld: The court determined that the insurer was entitled to terminate the contract because the policyholder had not fulfilled their obligation to pay the premiums, as required by the statutory insurance framework, and therefore upheld the termination.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
assicuratore disdetta assicurazione obbligatoria delle cure obbligo di pagamento indennità giornaliera di malattia sospensione della prestazione d'assicurazione
Generato dall'IA
II 2020 88
Claimants v. Insurer Regarding Supplemental Health Insurance Termination Date
I 2012 8
Insurer's Right to Terminate for Non-Disclosure of Pre-existing Condition
I 2024 21
Insurer Upheld in Terminating Accident Benefits Due to Pre-existing Condition
ZK1 2021 45
Employer Liability for Unpaid Sickness Benefits Offset by Insurer Payment
I 2018 76
Insurance Provider v. Injured Worker (Benefits Cessation)

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 92 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. März 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ GmbH, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Krankenversicherung (Taggeldversicherung nach KVG; Vertragsauflösung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: