Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2018 77 • VG SZ II 2018 77 Generato dall'IA

Tax Penalty Reconsideration Appeal Dismissed

Numero d'incarto II 2018 77
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerned an appeal against a decision regarding additional taxes and tax penalties for the years 2006 to 2011, specifically requesting a reconsideration of prior related decisions. The court reasoned that the request for reconsideration could only be granted if there were significant new facts or if the previous decision was based on a demonstrably flawed application of the law or a clear oversight, finding that the appellant failed to present such compelling grounds, thus affirming the prior ruling.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Tax Penalty Reconsideration Appeal Dismissed: The court reasoned that the request for reconsideration could only be granted if there were significant new facts or if the previous decision was based on a demonstrably flawed application of the law or a clear oversight, finding that the appellant failed to present such compelling grounds, thus affirming the prior ruling.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
riconsiderazione revisione d'imposta multa al contribuente decisione motivata impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio gravi motivi

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court ordered the application for reconsideration to be dismissed, and costs must be awarded according to this provision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 77 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 31. Oktober 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefan Getzmann, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A+B.________, \n Gesuchsteller, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Kantonale Steuerkommission/Kantonale Verwaltung für die direkte Bundessteuer, Bahnhofstrasse 15, Postfach 1232, 6431 Schwyz, \n Gesuchsgegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Nachsteuern 2006-2011 und Steuerstrafen 2006-2011: \n Wiedererwägung von VGE II 2017 82 + 83 sowie \n VGE II 2017 84 + 85, beide vom 9. Januar 2018 |\n

\n\n

\n