Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2018 65 • VG SZ II 2018 65 Generato dall'IA

Family Equalization Fund Contribution Calculation Dispute

Numero d'incarto II 2018 65
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged a decision by a family equalization fund, which concerned the calculation of their professional contributions. The court reasoned that when determining the contribution base, the fund was correct to consider the professional income earned during the entire period of employment for which the contribution was being calculated, even if the employment relationship was terminated before the end of the relevant period, as the obligation to pay contributions arose from the employment relationship itself.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Family Equalization Fund Contribution Calculation Dispute: The court reasoned that when determining the contribution base, the fund was correct to consider the professional income earned during the entire period of employment for which the contribution was being calculated, even if the employment relationship was terminated before the end of the relevant period, as the obligation to pay contributions arose from the employment relationship itself.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
calcolo del reddito durata di contribuzione rapporto di lavoro cassa di compensazione per gli assegni familiari obbligo di pagamento perequazione finanziaria Familienzulagen (Auszahlung an Arbeitnehmer) | Familienzulagen
Generato dall'IA
II 2020 53
Social Security Contribution Calculation Dispute
II 2020 56
Social Security Contribution Calculation Dispute and Procedural Compliance
II 2020 60
Appeal of Family Equalization Fund Decision on 2018 Allowances
II 2018 34
Social Security Fund Reimbursement Liability Based on Payment Date
II 2019 2
Pension Fund v. Employer: Unsubstantiated Dispute Over Pension Contributions

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 65 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. September 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n 1. Familienausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, \n Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n