Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2018 5 • VG SZ II 2018 5 Generato dall'IA

Municipal Development Plan Recalculation Challenge

Numero d'incarto II 2018 5
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The petitioners challenged a decision by a municipal council regarding the implementation of a development plan, specifically concerning the recalculation of building lot boundaries and the resulting compensation, asserting that the recalculation incorrectly reduced the usable area of their property and consequently undervalued the required compensation. The court held that the municipal council's application of the relevant planning regulations for recalculating the lot area, which relied on established spatial planning criteria and resulted in a smaller usable area, was not arbitrary or in violation of the petitioners' rights, thus affirming the lower authority's decision regarding the boundary determination and compensation calculation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Municipal Development Plan Recalculation Challenge: The court held that the municipal council's application of the relevant planning regulations for recalculating the lot area, which relied on established spatial planning criteria and resulted in a smaller usable area, was not arbitrary or in violation of the petitioners' rights, thus affirming the lower authority's decision regarding the boundary determination and compensation calculation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
piano di costruzione incentivazione immobiliare revisione del piano regolatore terreno comunale problema urbano diritto allo sviluppo Kausalabgaben (Erschliessungsbeiträge Elektrizitätswerk) | Kausalabgaben
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 5 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Juni 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Thomas Twerenbold, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n 1. A.________, 2. B.________, Beschwerdeführer, \n beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Gemeinderat Tuggen, Zürcherstrasse 14, Postfach 159, 8856 Tuggen, \n Vorinstanz, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n