Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2018 45 • VG SZ II 2018 45 Generato dall'IA

Social Insurance Supplementary Benefits Asset Waiver Requirement

Numero d'incarto II 2018 45
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision by the social insurance compensation office regarding supplementary benefits, specifically challenging the requirement to waive assets as a condition for receipt. The court reasoned that for supplementary benefits to be granted, the claimant must meet the statutory requirements, which include demonstrating a lack of means, and the underlying legal framework allows the authority to require the claimant to dispose of existing assets, such as real estate, to qualify for the benefit.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Social Insurance Supplementary Benefits Asset Waiver Requirement: The court reasoned that for supplementary benefits to be granted, the claimant must meet the statutory requirements, which include demonstrating a lack of means, and the underlying legal framework allows the authority to require the claimant to dispose of existing assets, such as real estate, to qualify for the benefit.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rinuncia alle prestazioni d'assicurazione prestazione d'assicurazione sociale assicurazione complementare sostanza determinante requisito legale diritto all'indennità di disoccupazione Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen
Generato dall'IA
II 2018 43
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2018 35
Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Decision on Asset Waiver
II 2020 42
Supplementary Benefits Asset Waiver Validity Appeal
II 2016 76
Claimant v. Benefits Authority Regarding Asset Waiver
II 2022 16
Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 45 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. Juni 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: