Unemployment Benefits Termination for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA claimant appealed a decision by the labor office regarding the cessation of entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits. The court affirmed the lower authority's decision, reasoning that the claimant's failure to accept a suitable job offer without valid justification constituted a breach of their duty to actively seek employment and maintain availability, thereby justifying the suspension or termination of their benefit entitlement under the relevant unemployment insurance provisions.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Unemployment Benefits Termination for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer: The court affirmed the lower authority's decision, reasoning that the claimant's failure to accept a suitable job offer without valid justification constituted a breach of their duty to actively seek employment and maintain availability, thereby justifying the suspension or termination of their benefit entitlement under the relevant unemployment insurance provisions.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.
Testo completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 40 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. April 2018 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung,