Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Decision on Asset Waiver
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA claimant appealed a decision regarding supplementary benefits, specifically concerning the waiver of assets, where the lower court had determined that certain assets needed to be relinquished. The court reasoned that the statutory provisions governing supplementary benefits mandate the exhaustion of private means before public assistance can be granted, and therefore upheld the requirement for the claimant to surrender the specified assets to qualify for the benefits.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 66 Abs. 1 zweiter Satz BGG; Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Decision on Asset Waiver: The court reasoned that the statutory provisions governing supplementary benefits mandate the exhaustion of private means before public assistance can be granted, and therefore upheld the requirement for the claimant to surrender the specified assets to qualify for the benefits.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appellant is ordered to pay the court fees because the appeal was dismissed.
Testo completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 35 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. Juni 2018 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n
\n \n