Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2018 24 • VG SZ II 2018 24 Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Administrative Body re: Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver

Numero d'incarto II 2018 24
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision concerning supplementary benefits, specifically challenging the requirement to waive assets, which the administrative body had deemed necessary for eligibility. The court ruled that the claimant's voluntary waiver of assets shortly before applying for benefits was not done for the purpose of qualifying for supplementary benefits, as the waiver was intended to benefit the claimant's grandchildren, and therefore, this pre-application waiver did not disqualify the claimant from receiving the supplementary benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Claimant v. Administrative Body re: Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver: The court ruled that the claimant's voluntary waiver of assets shortly before applying for benefits was not done for the purpose of qualifying for supplementary benefits, as the waiver was intended to benefit the claimant's grandchildren, and therefore, this pre-application waiver did not disqualify the claimant from receiving the supplementary benefits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni complementari sostanza determinante rinuncia alle prestazioni d'assicurazione beneficiario di prestazioni assistenziali gestione delle prestazioni di invalidità restituzione delle prestazioni Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Applied to order the appellant to pay the court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 24 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 15. Mai 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: